Council continues smoking ban discussion Around Town, posted by Editor, Danville Weekly Online, on Sep 8, 2011 at 8:39 am
An ordinance to prohibit smoking in Danville's recreational areas was discussed again at Tuesday's Town Council meeting. Despite some debate about smoker's rights, the council voted unanimously to continue the discussion on Sept. 20. The expanded ban would prohibit smoking in all of Danville's parks.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 7, 2011, 5:00 PM
Posted by Samantha, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 8, 2011 at 8:39 am
I used to work as a prevention researcher and one of the projects I was on was to research how local ordinances were or were not passed to ban smoking in restaurants and/or bars in about 20 different municipalities in the U.S. The conclusion that was made, in short, and it can be applied in this situation, is that there are often several different pathways to accomplish the ban. Different approaches can be used. Here is a website I just found that addresses this issue and may be of some use to our city council. For instance the "Pathway" our council can take is "Better Public Health in Our Community". Or maybe there is a better "Pathway/Approach" that would better address this issue in our community.
As a parent and ex-smoker of over 20 years, I am the "worst"... I wish people could only smoke inside their homes and cars. Interesting Website: Web Link
Another idea is that maybe the Danville Council could work with Contra Costa County on this so that all of the unincorporated parts of the Danville area would be included in the ordinance, if it were passed. Blackhawk, East Danville, Alamo, etc.
Posted by Julia, a resident of the Alamo neighborhood, on Sep 8, 2011 at 9:15 am
Samantha...Please consider keeping your suggestions in your own backyard and do not try and push your agenda outside the boundaries of your simple little town of Danville. Thank you so much thinking of us.
Julia Pardini from Beautiful Alamo...smoke and/or no smoke.
Posted by Free to Enjoy Clean Air, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 8, 2011 at 1:25 pm
Good health and the right to be free of other people's offensive habits is not an "agenda." Feel free to kill yourself in your own home or car, but don't impose your bad choices (and lethal, noxious fumes) on the rest of the residents--especially where kids play. Samantha offers creative ideas to help improve all of our lives. By analogy, we all accept and agree with ordinances limiting loud noise (leaf blowers early in the morning and loud parties late at night). That's what zoning laws are for. As Ms. Andersen astutely points out, "smoke doesn't stay within a container." Just as we have noise ordinances to preserve our collective right to quiet enjoyment in our community, we should have anti-smoking ordinances to do the same. In fact, anti-smoking laws are much more important--they protect our health, not just our peace and quiet. Since we can't avoid breathing the polluted air generated by smokers, it is necessary to proscribe their behavior. Smoking in public is a privilege, not a right. It should only be allowed to the extent it does not affect others negatively.
Posted by Joe, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 8, 2011 at 4:25 pm
I quit smoking over 40 years ago when I saw the lungs of a dead smoker in a formaltihyde (sic) jar. It was so horrible I never smoked again. I am amazed at how many young people are smoking these days. They are very intelligent too - why are they drawn to this deadly habit?
Posted by Samantha, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 8, 2011 at 11:32 pm
Geez Julia Pardini, Go smoke some of that marijuana you want legalized or grab a cig to calm yourself. "My backyard" is not in Danville proper, but in unincorporated Danville - part of Contra Costa County gov't. Therefore, whatever I am encouraging "in my backyard" would not be affected by what the Danville Council is doing. But, who knows... Your comment may once again be bounced and your comment will only further me now to push this FANTASTIC and LIFE-SAVING and HEALTHFUL AGENDA not only on Danville, but in the ENTIRE UNIVERSE. Your immature, sarcastic comment has totally, totally motivated me to get moving so that we can have a totally SMOKE-FREE Contra Costa County INCLUDING BEAUTIFUL (AND KINDA BORING) ALAMO!!!
P.S. Julia, whatcha youra problema? Notta fora the gooda healtha for the Americans? Maybe you need a trip back to good 'ole Italy to breathe in the smoka!
Posted by Alyson, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 9, 2011 at 7:06 am
Thank you Samantha ... over the past few years whenever I view the comments section of the Danville Weekly, it never fails ... Julia's negative comments appear everywhere! It just amazes me that someone can be so negative about the people and surroundings where she lives! Don't be so miserable Julia, life isn't so bad!
Posted by jjjj, a resident of the Alamo neighborhood, on Sep 9, 2011 at 9:03 am
please tell me where unincorporated Danville is located either you live in danville or the county you must want to impress by saying I live in Danville i would like to know where is unincorporated Danville
Posted by jrm, a member of the Vista Grande Elementary School community, on Sep 9, 2011 at 1:46 pm
Live and let live folks....I can't remember the last time I had to smell tobacco in a Danville park for more than a brief moment. If I want to smoke a cigar at the park (MAYBE once a year) I should be able to do so, get over yourself and your desire to regulate my random desire to have a cigar. Of course regular smokers have health complications, but that is a tradeoff they make personally to sustain their addiction. BUT, let me ask you this, obesity is the real looming problem for our country from a health standpoint...given the "anti-smoking" healthy platform, why should we not also regulate obesity? True story..I am in the healthcare business and right after a meeting with a Medical Director with Intermountain Healthplan in Salt Lake (Intermountain Healthcare is the integrated hospital/health insurance/religion regime in Utah) he had to go "get weighed" to check his weight. If he was overweight he was subject to sanction by his employer, the Mormon church. I was shocked, but yesiree...he had to go get weighed. Government,Religion...stay out of our lives. I still remember my Grandpa's cigars every now and then, enough of this NANNY abuse of power...I am not exaggerating, the Salt Lake story is true...
Posted by Whomever, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 9, 2011 at 6:39 pm
Danville has two zip codes in its city as far as I understand: 94526 and 94506. "Unincorprated Danville" means you have a 94506 zip code, but you are not within the Danville city boundaries, with City of Danville government oversight, such as the East side of Danville. and Blackhawk, which both have the 94506 zip codes. For example, if a police officer is needed in these areas, the Danville police would not be the ones to respond. The Contra Costa Sheriff's department oversee most of the criminal activity in those areas I suppose. Maybe Danville police would come if they needed backup for some reason, but I am no expert on how that all works.