Board of Education decides to maintain class sizes Schools & Kids, posted by Editor, Danville Weekly Online, on Jul 19, 2011 at 8:24 am
Class size in the K-3 grades will remain at 26 students while the number of students in freshman English and math classes will decrease from 28 to 26. The recommendation from the district was made based on better-than-projected state revenues, continuing enrollment growth and financial reserves.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, July 18, 2011, 4:16 PM
Posted by Dorthy, a resident of the Blackhawk neighborhood, on Jul 20, 2011 at 1:40 pm
Nice. A better student/teacher ratio for applying the "5 C's of 21st century learning":
critical thinking(it is soooo interesting when second graders analyze transformational grammar), communication(content- nothing; presentation- everything), creativity(writers, scientists, artists create that stuff out of air- no substantial/prior knowledge base necessary), curiosity(passively implemented?), and collaboration(it is easier and quicker to evaluate a group project than hold individuals accountable.)
And. Explanation, please. Wasn't the past principal of MVHS criticized for how money was allocated? Am I to understand from the technology post that money is being spent from one silo(bonds) on the 20th(yes, 20th) century technology for the various schools so that money from energy savings may be channeled to the general fund?
Posted by C. R. Mudgeon, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Jul 20, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Putting aside the question of whether class-size reduction is more for the students, or for the teachers/union, I am still happy to see that class size is staying the same for next year, and even declining a bit for freshmen English and math classes.
What I would like to see, however, as a follow-up, is a comparison of the pink-slip notices that were passed out last March (as warnings of potential lay-offs), versus the actual actions taken for this Fall. Basically a simple table, showing:
- teachers on-roll at end of the 2010-2011 school year (June 2011)
- number of pink-slips issued in March 2011 (or whenever they get issued in the Spring, as required by law)
- actual number of teachers laid off for the start of the 2011-2012 school year (could also include retirements and other voluntary departures)
- teachers on-roll as of September, 2011
This could also be extended to include administration headcount and other staff.
I understand that state law and union collective bargaining agreements require the district to issue pink slips in the Spring, to anyone who MIGHT be laid off by the Fall. But I also think that the number of pink slips issued is always MUCH larger than actual lay-offs, and in fact there may not be any lay-offs in most years. So it becomes mostly a stunt for garnering public support for more taxes.
This information should be published yearly - it's pretty basic, and as both taxpayers and residents of the district, we should have this info at our disposal.