Sign up for Express
Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Danville, California Forecast

TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS & MOVIES   COMMENTS ON STORIES
  CRIMES & INCIDENTS   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS
  STATE, NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL   ART SPACE   DIABLO VIEWS   DOING COLLEGE
  EDITOR'S BLOG   EPICURE   PUBLISHER'S BLOG   RAUCOUS CAUCUS
  REPORTER'S BLOG   SIMPLY STERLING   TEEN WIRE   TIM HUNT

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Danville' s redevelopment agency safe for now
Crimes & Incidents, posted by Editor, Danville Weekly Online, on Aug 11, 2011 at 6:46 pm

The California State Supreme Court issued a stay on an important piece of legislature that could eliminate redevelopment agencies statewide. Filed by the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association, the suit would stop Assembly bills 26 and 27 from taking effect.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, August 11, 2011, 5:13 PM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by [removed], a resident of the Alamo neighborhood, on Aug 11, 2011 at 6:46 pm

Dear Editor,

The Town (City) of Danville must have a development/redevelopment program to provide permit and similar fees each year to pay the costs of a resident planning department. It is appropriate for Danville neighborhoods forum, in their distribution today, to ask if such services would be more cost effective as consulting fees and would neighborhoods avoid the invasion of Weber Ranch and Hap Magee development.

That seems to be an excellent question considering the authoritarian imposition of development by city planning and council unwelcome in Danville neighborhoods.

You might complete this story beyond the news release with presentation of the role of development/redevelopment fees in the city (town) budget.


Posted by Penny, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Aug 12, 2011 at 6:41 am

I believe that investment in the pool is $500,000, not $5,000.


Posted by Geoff Gillette, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Aug 12, 2011 at 11:03 am
Geoff Gillette is a member (registered user) of Danville Express

Good morning,

Just wanted to clarify that Penny is correct and the Town's contribution to the pool at SRVHS is indeed $500,000.

Thanks!

Geoff Gillette

Public Information Coordinator

Town of Danville

(925) 314-3336

ggillette@danville.ca.gov


Posted by Jessica Lipsky, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Aug 12, 2011 at 12:36 pm

Thank you for pointing out that error, I've changed it in the story.

Way to be vigilant!

Jessica Lipsky

Editor


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

Danville Express ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.