Sign up for Express
Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Danville, California Forecast

Danville Express News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Controversial ridgeline project is a go
Town council votes 4-1 in favor of Skyvilla

Bookmark and Share
After more than a year of legal wrangling, the members of the Danville Town Council gave their grudging approval at their Tuesday meeting to a development request that would put a 7,000-square-foot home on a ridgeline above Danville.

"I would have liked to vote against it, but unless we're prepared to spend a lot more time, a lot more energy and resources, we don't have a lot of choice," said Mayor Mike Shimansky after the meeting.

Last November, the Town Council upheld a Planning Commission denial of Skyvilla's development request for a property at 1621 Lawrence Road. Skyvilla then filed a lawsuit and a Contra Costa County Superior Court judge overruled the decision, saying the town did not provide sufficient evidence to support its ruling. This brought the case back to the Town Council this week.

Town Planner David Crompton presented the updated plans and pointed out that while the applicant has not changed the square footage of the proposed single family home, it taken steps to reduce the visibility of the residence. Those changes include the elimination of a garage, which will allow the building to move further from the edge of the hillside, and the lowering of the height of the structure by 18 inches.

Skyvilla representative David Bowie explained they are limited in where they can build.

"This is a highly unique situation," he said.

Bowie said professional planners who have looked at the parcel say the location on the ridgeline is the only suitable spot.

Councilman Newell Arnerich disagreed, saying other surveys of the land have shown that potential sites are available.

Public comment was strongly against allowing the house to be built. Tom Flood and Jim Richards, both of whom live on Lawrence Road, said they believe the council should continue to deny the construction despite the court's ruling.

"Are you five council members going to let one man's opinion trump your five opinions?" Flood asked.

"It doesn't seem right what we'll be doing to the families in Dougherty Valley," Richards added. "I'd want to keep the ridgelines clear."

Danville resident Ralph Hoffmann called on the council to approve the plan, since the court had ruled in the applicant's favor.

"I just have to ask, how much money has been wasted on staff time and effort fighting this?" Hoffmann asked.

He then accused council members of having been unduly influenced in their decision making on the issue and quoted former California Assemblyman Jesse Unruh, saying, "Money is the mother's milk of politics."

Hoffmann's comments sparked an angry response from Councilman Mike Doyle, who responded, "There is not a person in this world who can buy my vote."

The council discussed the efforts made by the applicant to make the residence less noticeable.

"I feel this project has been scrutinized. I feel justified in saying they've done everything they've been asked," said Doyle.

Councilwoman Karen Stepper agreed.

"I appreciate that the applicant went to a much lower profile," she said.

Arnerich said despite the court's ruling, the structure being proposed goes against the intent of the Major Ridgeline Ordinance.

"The message from the Planning Commission was, 'Bring a smaller structure.' That is our purview to do that," he said.

"I can understand how the court can come to that judgment," he also noted. "I don't like it, but I understand it."

Shimansky said that after listening to the discussion, hearing from legal counsel and the judge, he had no choice but to vote in favor of allowing the home. He added that the council will be directing staff to examine the town's ridgeline ordinance with an eye toward tightening up the restrictions.

When Shimansky called for a motion, uncomfortable minutes passed while council members looked at each other, unwilling to make a motion for approval. Finally Councilwoman Candace Andersen moved to approve the Skyvilla appeal, seconded by Doyle, and the request was approved 4-1 with Arnerich voting against it.

Bowie said he was pleased with the vote.

"It means we'll go ahead with this construction," he said.

"I understand the council's feelings," he added, "but this is an application that was made within the town's ordinances. This is going to be a very, very nice home with a lot of open space."

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Hal Bailey, a resident of the Alamo neighborhood, on Sep 20, 2007 at 4:50 pm

A lesson learned!

The county will use its courts to impose abuse on communities including incorporated cities. Thus, if any community wishes to be independent of aggregated politics, the answer is a very mighty warchest and exceptional actions by counsel. It will not be long before all communities are the towns named SUE.

It will take a very private effort representing a majority with MONEY to stop the abuse of our skyline and ridgeline. Alamo and Danville combined has an annual income collectively near $5 million. We should be able to change the minds of individual affluence, now shouldn't we?

Sic'em,

Hal


Posted by Hal Bailey, a resident of the Alamo neighborhood, on Sep 20, 2007 at 4:57 pm

correction: Alamo and Danville residents have an income collectively near $5 BILLION.

Again, Sic-em,

Hal


Posted by Call me Mike, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Sep 28, 2007 at 9:30 pm

Boy, the Town of Danville sure rolled over on this one! Skyvilla bought a ten acre parcel dirt cheap and is going to turn it into a silk purse, at everyone else's expense. The lot was dirt cheap because it has driveways for its neighboors criss-crossing it every which way, and it has the pesky "major scenic ridgeline" restriction. Those two things prevent construction of a house on all but the lowermost part of the lot. But not to worry! Get the right soils engineers, the right lawyers, and bada-bing bada-bang, the Town rolls over!! 7,000sf McMansion on top of the hill!!

Truthfully, I'm all for property rights but this particular case is going to force the Town to preemptively attack property rights for every hillside development from now on. Enjoy your victory Skyvilla, ya bastige!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

Danville Express ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.