|
|
|
Uploaded: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 5:20 PM
Supes oppose name change for Mount D
|
Photo
 | Contra Costa County supervisors voted unanimously today in opposition of changing the name of "Mount Diablo'' to "Mount Reagan'' in honor of former president and California governor Ronald Reagan.
The board's vote was in response to a petition from Oakley resident Arthur Mijares, who said that he is a Christian and to him the name "Devil" for the mountain is "derogatory, pejorative, offensive, obscene, blasphemous and profane."
The U.S. Board on Geographical Names, which would make the decision on whether to change the name, had asked the supervisors to give their opinion on the proposed change.
The supervisors agreed to write a letter to the Board on Geographical Names stating that they oppose any change to the name because of the overwhelming support from the community of keeping the name Mount Diablo, the historical significance of the name and the financial implications of a name change to local businesses and government agencies that use the name "Diablo" in their titles.
According to the conservation group Save Mount Diablo, the reference to "diablo" or the devil can be traced back to 1805 when Spanish military troops were searching for runaway Mission Indians. The soldiers found a camp of Chupcan people and surrounded it, but during the night, the Indians escaped without notice into the thick brush. The foiled soldiers called the site "Monte del Diablo" or "Thicket of the Devil."
Later, English-speaking settlers mistakenly assumed that the name "monte" meant "mountain" and called the mountain "Mount Diablo."
Benjamin Medel, who said he is a descendent of the Miwok tribe that lived in Contra Costa County, said he was in favor of renaming the peak, in part because the name to him represents the historic mistreatment of American Indians.
"It's time, it's appropriate and it's right," Medel said of renaming the mountain, which he said was once a sacred place for native people. "It's the right thing to do."
However, he suggested the new name reflect the mountain's historical ties to the Miwok tribe.
Another speaker, Robert Ericson, said he was against naming the mountain "Mount Reagan," but was in favor of changing the name. He recommended the name Mount John Muir after the conservationist.
Ericson said he wanted the matter placed on the ballot to let voters decide.
He also said that he believed that the Miwok Indians should be given the opportunity to name the peak, since it was originally their territory.
Concord resident Joann Hull, however, said she opposes any change to the name because of the history it represents.
Likewise, Roland Gaebert, State Park Superintendent of Mount Diablo, said he strongly opposed any change to the name, also citing the historical significance of the current name.
The petition to change the mountain's name is Mijares' second attempt. In 2005, he petitioned the U.S. Board on Geographical Names to change the name to "Mount Yahweh." The board also considered the names "Mount Miwok" and "Mount Ohlone," but ultimately decided against changing the name after hearing opposition from county supervisors, the California Advisory Committee on Geographic Names and numerous local organizations, many of which use the name "Diablo" in their titles.— Bay City News Service Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by Bill, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Feb 24, 2010 at 6:58 am Just preposterous that one with fringe thinking could cause all this uproar and actually get this to a vote of the supes. How much has this cost the taxpayers and how much has Mijares paid for this fiasco?
|
|
Posted by Duffy, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Feb 24, 2010 at 7:58 am I think we should be thankful that the name suggested was not Mount Obama or it would probablt be a done deal!
|
|
Posted by Sarah, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Feb 24, 2010 at 8:26 am You'd think that with the C.C.C being in financial dodo, the Board would have something better to do than spend their time even considering such nonsense.I have called several times and asked to talk to my Supervisor and can't even get a call back.What made them jump through hoops with this guy?
|
|
Posted by klat_wols, a resident of the Blackhawk neighborhood, on Feb 24, 2010 at 10:40 am Yeah!
|
|
Posted by Anna Pitt, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Feb 25, 2010 at 1:34 pm Arthur Mijares is a threat to mankind and should be strung from the highest tree on sacred Mt. Diablo!!
|
|
Posted by Leslie King, a resident of the Walnut Creek neighborhood, on Feb 25, 2010 at 2:19 pm Anna Pitt's comment said, I'm sure, with a touch of humor, is s sentiment I share. Arthur's thought process must be scary!
|
|
Posted by Derek, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Feb 25, 2010 at 2:57 pm It always warms my black heart to see a bible-thumping nutsack slapped down a notch. What next - does he want to rename Mt. Whitney "Caviezel Peak"?
To expand on what Bill said, what did this cost us, and when will CCC be sending Mijares the invoice? There's a story for you to follow up on Dolores.
|
|
Posted by Ralph N. Shirlet, a resident of another community, on Feb 25, 2010 at 5:05 pm Ralph N. Shirlet is a member (registered user) of Danville Express Dear Dolores,
We of course know that CCC-BOS has no jurisdiction for the lands and name of Mount Diablo. It is a state property.
We also know that anything named for the devil is quite consistent with our county politics. So of course our Devil Mountain has been saved in its elegance as Mount Diablo. Oh, what would it be in Mandarin?
There is devil in all of us to celebrate, but not advocate, so we only celebrate our devil mountain with a Diablo View Point.
Oh, HAL, the devil you say,
The ROFL in Ralph N. Shirlet
|
|
Posted by dan, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Feb 28, 2010 at 5:58 pm
This is how your tax dollars are spent. You would never spend your money this way, but others spending your money found this a worthy
pursuit. If these were your employees you would fire them for lack
of performance.
|
|
|
| |
|